Impostor at Stanford

May 27th, 2007

What a weird story. The LA Times reports that an 18-year-old impostor named Azia Kim successfully passed as a student at Stanford for eight months:

The Stanford Daily, quoting one of Kim's former roommates, said the deception started in September, the day before Stanford's orientation for new students.

Two sophomores agreed to let Kim stay in their room after she told them she did not like the roommate she had been assigned.

During the fall and winter terms, Kim allegedly slept in the other women's room or the lounge of the 210-resident dorm. Last month, she moved into another dorm after being referred to another student who needed a roommate.

Residence hall associates became suspicious after comparing conflicting statements Kim allegedly gave and contacting the student housing office. Kim was confronted Monday and escorted from campus, according to the Stanford Daily.

Amy Zhou, Kim's roommate in the second dorm, said Kim apparently got into the room through the window because she never had a key.

Kim told other students she was a sophomore majoring in human biology and bought textbooks and studied with friends.

"Personally, I don't feel safe now that Stanford allowed this to happen and that they're not doing anything to ensure the safety of their students," Zhou said. "I think something's definitely wrong with the system if this could happen."

No word yet on whether she took classes, ate at the cafeteria, etc. (Not that it matters, but I wonder if she was a dinged applicant who decided she was going to attend Stanford anyway?)

It's disturbing that she got away with this for eight months. That several students let this stranger move in with them, no questions asked, serves as a caution. Having to climb through the window to get in and out of the room because she never had a key? I hate to tell people that they are too trusting, but there is such a thing.  (See here for my posting about an experiment in which college students easily let themselves be lured into a stranger's van and tied up with duct tape.)

And while the (real) Stanford student quoted above is right that there are obviously some problems with the current "system" if this was able to happen, students also need to take responsibility for their own safety, and for each other's safety. All the security in the world isn't going to help if you let an impostor climb through your window for eight months. It can be embarrassing to confront someone you suspect of being a fraud, or to yell for help when you suspect someone may be trying to harm you. What if you're wrong? What if they're actually harmless, nice people? It's an embarrassment we need to get over.

So far there's a happy ending in the sense that no one got hurt, but it's a nice reminder that there are a lot of strange ducks out there, both on campus and off, and we need to be careful.

re: Impostor at Stanford

I've been following this story through the Stanford Daily Online, which allows faculty, students, alumni, and parents as well as folks without Stanford affiliations to post comments. Numerous comments suggest that Ms. Kim should be offered admissions for her "ingenious" ability to work the system. Some comments (many from students, not all laced with sarcasm) go so far to say that "if she wants it that bad, she deserves it." As a Stanford alum, I find this kind of thinking outrageous and revealing of generational tendencies towards entitlement that Anna has blogged about in other posts here.

re: Impostor at Stanford

That's astonishing, not just for the warped sense of entitlement, as you point out, but also for the loosey-goosey attitude towards cheating, lying, fraud, student safety, possible mental instability, and possible criminal activity.

And aren't they proud that they got into Stanford the legitimate way? Most of them had to work awfully hard, and be awfully impressive, to get there. Do they value the privilege of their Stanford education so little?

re: Impostor at Stanford

Stanford students and others who are apparently in "awe" of Azia Kim's so called intelligence, ingenuity, and craftiness should experience identity theft. They should experience the joy and wonder associated with opening their credit card statement to find charges for a Hermes Birkin bag -- as they walk away from the mailbox clutching a Guess? bag bought on clearance at TJ Maxx. Just kidding.

But seriously, I am intrigued in many ways by Azia. I want to know how Azia planned for her plot to unfold, and more importantly, what drove her to such great lengths to live a life that was inorganic at best. It is too easy to blame this on the parents, the "Asian syndrome," and so on. Implicitly underlining all of the headlines bearing this 18 year old's name is how psychologically troubled she must have been to risk so much for...nothing. Personally, I think that Azia should get another chance, not at admittance to Stanford, but to live out her life truthfully.