Yikes! Should I Cancel My LSAT Score?
Congratulations to the LSAT test takers among our readers! How does it feel? Do you think you nailed it? Are you happy to have it behind you? Or are you feeling queasy and agonizing about whether to cancel your score and retake? Or maybe you want to see how you did on this test and then decide whether to retake it? Just having the option of canceling causes applicants a lot of anguish, so I'll post some thoughts on the cancellation analysis, and also on the leave-my-score-and-retake-it analysis.
Canceling Your LSAT Score
Before you walk out of your LSAT test, and (as of this writing) for six calendar days afterward, you have the option of canceling your score. While that score won't be reported to law schools, admissions officers will get to see that you took the test and canceled your score. Does that look bad? It depends.
Admissions officers understand that bad days can and do happen, and they generally won't look askance at a single score cancellation. Most of them remain agnostic in that situation.
However, if you cancel it a second or a third time, at best you start looking like a flake. At worst, you look like someone who can't handle the pressure of a half-day test, and they will rightly wonder how you're going to survive law school (you won't get to cancel and retake that six-hour take-home Property Law exam), let alone the bar exam (which lasted three days each in the two states in which I took it), let alone legal practice (think law firm partners are going to give you lots of chances for do-overs? None that I know of). So if you do need to cancel, treat the cancellation as a one-time free pass.
However, don't treat the first test as something you can waltz into on the assumption that you can always cancel and retake it. First of all, admissions officers expect you to do better each additional time you take it, because it's less scary and more familiar when you've taken the real thing before. They think that taking the test and then canceling the score gives you an advantage over someone who doesn't have the benefit of having taken the test before. You should feel well prepared walking into that test, and use the cancellation option for a worst-case scenario.
So when should you cancel your score? If you've been prepping smartly for the test, you'll have a decent sense before the test if you're scoring where you want to be, and you'll have a sense during the test, too, whether things are going as planned. If you know, as you walk out of the test, that you didn't finish a section that you normally finish, or that you bubbled in the wrong lines, or that your stomach staged a rebellion, those are good reasons to cancel. If your next test goes better, no harm done -- that's a happy scenario -- and you're better off showing admissions officers your one great score rather than taking it over and over again on a reported basis.
If, instead, you can't pinpoint anything that went wrong, but you're just feeling a bit nauseated by the anxiety of having studied so hard and so long for this test and now you've finally taken it and you have to wait for a score that determines where you go to the law school that will determine the rest of your life and OH MY GOD NOW YOU'RE FREAKING OUT... well, that's called spiraling, and that's not a good enough reason to cancel. You might have done just fine, in which case, wouldn't it be nice to put the LSAT behind you and NEVER, EVER have to take it again? And when the score comes, if you learn that you didn't do just fine, you can take it again with the benefit of of your score report and being able to analyze which kinds of questions caused you the most trouble.
You won't get to see your score before you cancel, so you'll have to make the cancellation decision with imperfect information: you'll have to assess your performance against the benchmark of your practice exams. The more realistically you've been simulating real test taking conditions during your practice tests, the better you'll be able to gauge how did on the real thing.
And finally, before you get too trigger-happy with the cancellation option, keep in mind the LSAC rule that limits you to taking the LSAT up to three times in two years (including scores you cancel).
Receiving Your Score and Retaking the LSAT
Schools will see results from all tests -- up to 12 -- for which you registered in the previous five years, including absences and cancellations. Some law schools say that they average multiple scores, but bear in mind that the ABA requires law school to report the high score, and it's the ABA data that US News & Word Report relies on for its rankings. For that reason, schools have an incentive to focus on the high score, regardless of what they tell you publicly.
What does that mean for you? If you walk out of the test feeling strongly that you can squeeze some more points out of the LSAT, and the LSAT/GPA calculator tells you that a few more points would make a difference for the schools you're interested in, you should retake it. Treat the next test as a clean slate. Many applicants tell me that they worry how it will look if there's a really big jump, to which I reply: If there's a big jump, pop the champagne. That can only be good news.
Second, don't assume that your score will necessarily go up -- it can go down, too. Even though admissions officers have an incentive to focus on the high score, they are still subject to the laws of human psychology (and consumer psychology), and you'll look better applying with one really strong score that stands on its own in shining glory than applying with multiple attempts that show incremental improvements (admissions officer: "hmmm....I wonder which test is the outlier here: the high score or the low score?"), not to mention a score drop. Nobody walks into a second or third LSAT exam thinking "my score will drop today," but it does happen. Score drops just don't look good when -- as admissions officers know -- most people's scores go up slightly with each successive test. It's better to take the test once, when you're feeling in peak form, with the understanding that you can always take it again if you have a bad day. And if you do take it again, you should feel quite confident that your score will go up, and walk into the test knowing that you did something different this time: you studied harder/better/smarter, or that you took the test more calmly/more smartly/more strategically.
If an application asks you to explain a change (whether an increase or a decrease) in your LSAT scores, see my previous blog posting on that question here.
So, test-takers: how do you feel? Are you inclined to cancel, or wait and see how you did? Please share!
Former Dean of Admissions at the University of Chicago Law School and a recovering lawyer, Anna Ivey founded Ivey Consulting to help college, law school, and MBA applicants navigate the admissions process. Read more admissions tips in The Ivey Guide to Law School Admissions, recently updated and available as an e-book. Follow Anna on Twitter (@annaivey).




I studied for the exam independently for about 6 weeks and felt fairly confident going in. I felt like I did very well on the logical reasoning section. However, when I got to the games section they tripped me up. I usually complete at least 2 games feeling confident that I correctly answered all the questions. Unfortunately, this did not happen for me yesterday. I'm not sure whether it was nerves or a set of games not suited for my strengths, but I didn't feel like I had a good grasp of any of the games. I ended up having to guess on a lot more questions than I would have liked. We took a break after the games section and I was pretty disappointed in my performance. The next section on the test was Reading Comp, which is typically my strongest section (missing 3-4/27 on PTS). I couldn't stop thinking about my games performance on this section, which resulted in the 5 minute warning being called as I was finishing the 3rd set of questions. This left me only about 1-2 minutes to read the 4th passage, and another 3.5-4 minutes to answer 7 questions. I am confident that I got 1, maybe 2 questions right. The rest were basically guesses. Due to my performance on the games and RC combined, I am thinking my best bet might be to cancel my score. Take a formal prep course and re-take the exam in October. In order for me to get the score I would have liked, I will have needed to correctly answer every question that I had sufficient time to consider. This would mean perfect performances on both LR sections, 20/27 on reading comp, and at least 5 right in games. Although the optimist in me says it might be possible, I don't think this is realistic. Although, just out of morbid curiosity I would like to know what my score is. Any suggestions?
CK1377, so sorry about your bad day. I actually hear this kind of post mortem from a lot of test takers: for whatever reason, you do badly on a particular section, and then when you should be focusing on the rest of the test and giving it your best, your mind is still ruminating about the section you think you screwed up, and you can't concentrate on the section in front of you. You end up sabotaging yourself. And it's doubly sad when the section that was so distracting turns out to have been experimental, as some people discover later in the test. Either way, it's an unhappy outcome.
I agree that you should cancel this one and retake it. I can appreciate the morbid curiosity, but don't let that drive your decision.
It's really important to approach each section with a clean slate mentality -- easier said than done, but maybe if you're aware of that tendency/temptation, you can talk yourself through it next time. Please check back in and let us know how your next test goes. Good luck!
I took the exam in Feb 2010 but misbubbled the RC section so I canceled. Since then I studied very hard and was PT’ing around 170-172 before the June exam. I was confident going into the June exam until I hit the LG section. Usually I do very well on it but 2 games screwed me up (had to guess on last 4 questions of the section). The last RC passage was difficult for me too. Should I cancel (which would be 2 cancels already), or wait for the score? Either way, I think I would have to retake in Oct since I’m pretty sure I didn’t do well, at least not up to my potential. For admissions: would cancel-cancel-hopefully high score be better than cancel-low score-hopefully high score? I'm looking to apply to top-10 schools.
Thanks
Hi Shan -- thanks for posting. It's a reminder to other test takers that people don't always do better (or think they do better) when they take it a second or even a third time. I know hope is a powerful and good force, and it's natural to assume "of course I'll do better next time." But something else can go wrong, or you might just feel crummy about some other section than you did last time. That's pretty common.
We're all different people, and we all max out at different scores on the test. So you (both you specifically, but also you as in other readers) have to try to be realistic about whether
(a) the real tests have actually reflected your potential for the test (even if you don't like what the real tests are telling you), or
(b) you really did have two bad days, and it's the third time that will be the accurate reflection of your potential for the test.
I hear from a lot of applicants that they perform worse on the real thing than on their practice tests, and so it might be realistic to bake in some "melt" when you're gauging what kind of score you're going to get compared to your practice tests. (In my experience talking to test takers, up to -5 points vs. performance on practice tests is pretty realistic.)
Regarding the admissions question: Since you've already taken the test twice, you'll be assumed to have the benefit of those two real tests *whether or not you cancel*. You will have raised expectations about how you'll do on your third test, since you have all that experience now under real testing conditions. So then the only questions to ask yourself are:
(1) Do you think you did well enough on the second test to wait and see what the score is, in case it's decent and you want to stick with it? And
(2) Even if you don't think you did that well, is it realistic to think that you'll do better a third time? Or are the first two test experiences telling you something (admittedly hard to hear) about your potential for the test?
You were pretty confident you'd do better the second time, but it sounds as if you don't think you did that much better. Unless you feel quite confident that you can exceed your prior performance the third time, it's possible that the way you've been performing is likely to be repeated. You have two real testing experiences now that serve as data points, and you are treating them both as outliers (because you think neither of them was up to your potential). I'm not in a position to tell you you're wrong about that, but it's a possibility to think about.
If you're really convinced you did poorly (your answer to question 1), and that you can do better (your answer to question 2), then it does sound as if you should cancel and retake. I do think that cancel-cancel-high score looks better than cancel-low score-high score from an admissions perspective.
Be prepared, though, for the possibility that you walk out of the third test feeling just as you did the first two times. And at that point, you'll have to stick with your score. And don't be too hard on yourself if the third test feels a lot like the first two. I agree it could be worth a shot, though, to find out. You don't want to lose sleep down the road wondering what would have happened if you had taken it that one last time.
Good luck -- please let us know what happens.
Readers: Am I being too harsh? Any advice you'd like to share?
I have taken the LSAT four times in the last 3.5 years and my scores have been as follows: 156, cancel (I fell ill), 159 and 154. The last score I received was from the June 2010 exam, for which I was incredibly confident -- I consistently scored in the high 160s/low 170s leading up to the exam. I am completely puzzled by the dramatic score drop. A law school, to which I am applying, sponsored me for a 4th retake in October, and though I have yet to register, I am wondering whether it is worth taking it again? I would really like to score at least a 165, and given my last studying routine, I was convinced that I would at least break 160. I'm just dumbfounded, to be honest.
More importantly, will I commit admissions suicide by having FIVE scores on my file, even if I do score 165+ in October?
Thanks.
My nephew took the lsat's and misbubbled. he only realized this at the endof the test.
he scored 158. But he got 15 out of 16 in the last section incorrect because he misbubbled.
is there any process in place to evaluate his answers and adjust the score accordingly? I know that there is a process where one can request a a hand scoring. if there seems to be a problem with the equipment, often the score will be adjusted. however this is for machine error, not for misbubbling. Is there any process in place to determine if there was a misbubbling.
Hi @dipas -- I'm sure it's very frustrating to your nephew to realize what happened. Misbubbling is considered a test taker mistake, not a problem with the test itself, so his only recourse it to retake the test. Avoiding careless mistakes is a key part of success on any test, including standardized tests, so getting into the habit of checking and rechecking that he is filling in the correct lines needs to be a part of his training for the test.
Hi. I took the LSAT yesterday (10/1/11). I don't know if I should cancel my score. I don't believe I performed to my potential, so I was looking for some advice. The first section was LG. I go through 2/3 of the section and guessed on about 8-9 questions. The next section was LR, and I guessed on about 13-15 questions (The section after that was RC and I think it was the experimental). The next section was RC, and I guessed on about 5 questions. The last section was LR, and I guessed on about 5 questions. I am shooting for a 160 score, which I don't think I got yesterday, but I also don't want to have a sub 150 score on my record. Any advice?
I took the LSAT on Saturday and I don't think I faired very well. I'm guessing I scored somehwere in the low to mid 160s after consistently score mid to high 170s on 10+ practice tests. Despite this discrepancy I am hesitant to cancel this score becuase I often understestimate my performances on tests (this was the case for the SATs and GMAT). This brings me to my question. How do law schools view cancellations followed by a great score versus a low score followed by a big jump If they view them equally... I'm inclined to receive my score so that I can learn from the test/my mistakes.
I took the LSAT today. I walked in there knowing I would do okay. I walked out of there feeling like y head would explode. I also am resolved not to cancel. I think today was a huge learning experience for me. It was a totally new experience to take an test that is that challenging. Maintaining focus for that long was also a new experience that one really can't prepare for. When I receive my score report, I'll know that the score I received is mine, and can go from there.
If you've prepared properly for the LSAT, the challenging nature of the test shouldn't come as a surprise, nor should the endurance or focus that are required. You can train for all of that, and it should feel pretty predictable when you take the real, scored test. I would consider cancelling if it was that much of a learning experience, and invest in good test prep. Pretend you're training for a marathon — you wouldn't attempt that without training either, right?
See http://www.annaivey.com/iveyfiles/2011/05/a_pep_talk_of_sorts_for_june_lsat_takers and http://www.annaivey.com/iveyfiles/2011/07/should_i_take_the_lsat_a_third_time